Virtual Assistants in Philippine Academic Libraries: A Comparative Analysis of Features, Accessibility,and User Engagement
Keywords:
Virtual Assistant (VA), Library Services, Library Support, Academic Libraries, and PhilippinesAbstract
This study examines the implementation of different virtual assistants (VAs) in academic libraries across various Philippine universities to determine the best features of different VAs, and to explore the role of VA platforms in accessibility and effectiveness of the services. Web content analysis is used in collecting data from ten academic institutions based from Commission on Higher Education (CHED) list of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), revealing a mx of VA types including live librarians, chatbots, and AI-driven systems, supported by platforms such as TAWK.to, Springshare, Freshworks, Tidio, and PureChat. The analysis highlights the following: 1) types of VAs and platforms used by academic libraries, 2) comparing the different features and technical specifications, and 3) accessibility and effectiveness of VA platforms. The study underscores the need for enhanced platform integration and improved AI capabilities to optimize user experience in Philippine academic libraries.
References
Adetayo, A. J. (2023). Conversational assistants in academic libraries: enhancing reference services through Bing Chat. Library Hi Tech News. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-08-2023-0142
Amzat, O. B., & Adewojo, A. A. (2023). Metaverse-infused academic libraries: a glimpse into the future. Library Hi Tech News, 40(10), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/lhtn-10-2023-0187
Bode, J. B. (2023). Virtual reference assistant: Its implementation and utilization among academic libraries during the COVID-19 pandemic [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Central Philippine University.
https://repository.cpu.edu.ph/handle/20.500.12852/3129
Curtis, R. G., Bartel, B., Ferguson, T., Blake, H. T., Northcott, C., Virgara, R., & Maher, C. A. (2021). Improving User Experience of Virtual Health Assistants: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(12), e31737. https://doi.org/10.2196/31737
García De Blanes Sebastián, M., Antonovica, A., & Sarmiento Guede, J. R. (2022). Application and extension of the UTAUT2 model for determining behavioral intention factors in use of the artificial intelligence virtual assistants. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993935
Nwosu, J. C., John, H. C., Izang, A. A., & Akorede, O. J. (2018). Assessment of information and communication technology (ICT) competence and literacy skills among undergraduates as a determinant factor of academic achievement. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(15), 582-589. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2018.3539
Pandey, P., & Rai, A. K. (2023). Consumer Adoption of AI-powered Virtual Assistants (AIVA): An Integrated Model Based on the SEM–ANN Approach. FIIB Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/23197145231196066
Rodriguez, S., & Mune, C. (2022). Uncoding library chatbots: deploying a new virtual reference tool at the San Jose State University library. Reference Services Review, 50(3/4), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/rsr-05-2022-0020
Senthilkumar, K. R., Sangeetha, S., & Jagajeevan, R. (2024). Impact of AI on Library and Information Science in Higher Institutions in India (pp. 21–33). igi global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2782-1.ch002
Xiong, Y., Liu, N., Pu, Q., & Shi, Y. (2023). More trust or more risk? User acceptance of artificial intelligence virtual assistant. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 34(3), 190–205.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
